Hey guys, so lately I've heard a few folks on the news refer some Democrats' call to abolish ICE as a radical position? Really? You do realize that ICE has only been around since 2003, right? We've dealt with various immigration issues for a lot longer than that. So how is abolishing a recently created agency, "radical?"
If you want to keep ICE, fine. I could see either reforming or abolishing it. I've said before that I don't think abolishing ICE is a winning position for elections, and I think we can make it more humane. That being said, I would never say that we need an organization that's only been around since 2003. So why is abolishing ICE radical? Please explain.
No comments:
Post a Comment